The General Post Master Council amends the “Zero Tolerance Policy” to include exile!

THE REIGN OF THE HEAVENS SOCIETY POST


Published on 02-23-2017 by THE REIGN OF THE HEAVENS SOCIETY POST


International Public Notice

Due to recent events in the State of Oregon wherein crimes of indifference have occurred in retaliation for exiling certain parties in the Carolyn Rousseau case, and further when people claim a Nationality bringing lots of baggage with them, the General Post Master Council amended its “Zero Tolerance Policy”.  Zero Tolerance Policy is just a title and not necessarily a policy, it is a specific rule and judicial procedure of the court itself. The term “Zero Tolerance Policy” was the name of the rule and judicial procedure for foreign communication purposes.   LINK

The human rights defenders received multiple conflicting reports of the death of Carolyn Rousseau. Every report was different coming from the State of Oregon.  The only conclusion at this time  is negligence at best.  One report came from someone that witnessed Carolyn’s death stated ” We let her pass” as if it were a justifiable and humane thing to do.  To this day, not one of the reports offered to let Carolyn’s husband visit her body to say goodbye before cremation.  Carolyn Rousseau’s death came two weeks after the exile judgment was published.  All of the exiled were democrats. 

One of the amendments are as follows:

IT IS HEREBY NOTICED that any attempt to publicly slander or otherwise demonize a documented American National,
Declared Resident, or General Post Master with the use of inflammatory labels including but not limited to “sovereign citizen”, “anti
-government” “anarchist”, “radical” and the like, will result in an immediate charge of attempted murder brought against the perpetrator(s) by the Government of The United States of America wherein their person shall be placed in EXILE within three days by Executive Order, and
This rule applies to all jurisdictions within the metes and bounds of The United States of America, foreign, domestic, or other. The office of the Governor for the Government of The United States of America is ready and willing to sign any order against those people that do not respect the human rights of others. The exile order could also be applied to those that are immigrating from other countries. The American Nationals that have already claimed a Nationality with very little baggage have not been harassed and have been left alone. The Government of The United States of America inherited the Carolyn Rousseau case that started back in 2008. The Government of The United States of America is usually very tolerant of foreign torts and human rights violations, and further, take great pains in solving the problems diplomatically,  however, when there are people at war with humanity, toleration must take a back seat for the safety of those coming forward from the next generation.
Carolyn Rousseau’s death did not happen in vain.  Our prayers are with her husband where may he find peace.  

02-23-2017

Introducing the amended Social Compact Agreement and Declaration of Rights for RESIDENTS and American Nationals!

THE REIGN OF THE HEAVENS SOCIETY POST


Published on 02-21-2017 by THE REIGN OF THE HEAVENS SOCIETY POST


International Public Notice

Back in the day when all of this started with the claim of the original Confederacy of 1781 and General Post Office of 1775, a Social Compact Agreement was signed and published by the original claimants. Much has changed since that time so here is the amended Social Compact Agreement if interested in reading it. LINK

Further, a Declaration of Rights was written and published back in 2012 for RESIDENTS and affirmed American Nationals which has been amended February 20th, 2017. LINK:  This particular Declaration is a requirement for RESIDENTS and American Nationals that are not General Post Masters to sign in order to serve on the Great Jury in one of the judicial districts of The United States of America. LINK

There is a lot that can be accomplished if we all work together.

02-21-2017

How to fund a Government without direct taxation!


 

RoH-Post-Logo


 

Published on 02-03-2016 by THE REIGN OF THE HEAVENS SOCIETY POST


 

INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE

The resolution agreed upon by the committee for the Government of The United States of America was and is a simple resolution that is human rights compliant when it comes to the concept of direct taxation.

Governments have become enemies of their own people through the concept of direct taxation. The concept has caused many revolutions and downfalls of many governments over thousands of years. However, there is a resolution to the problem.

The problem of direct taxation has been resolved while at the same time funding all local, state and federal levels. Direct taxation has been the root of all human rights violations in America. 

The resolution is called “The Land of Milk and Honey Treaty of 2016”.

The Land of Milk and Honey comes from an ancient event back in the time of the Israelite’s and Yahweh. The term implies and expresses that the resources of the land possessed belonged to the people and was apportioned equally to each one of the people under their control. The natural resources were not intended to be controlled by a privileged few. 

The resolution is simple:

1: Accept and acknowledge that the people control the minerals of the land they possess.

 2: Properly regulate the producers and consumers.

The articles of the resolution are as follows with commentary in red lettering and presented in the form of a Treaty:

The Land of Milk and Honey Treaty of 2016

INTRODUCTION

The Government of The United States of America, committed to the principle that all people should prosper from the minerals within the metes and bounds of their respective countries, hereby brings forth this agreement entitled “The Land of Milk and Honey Treaty of 2016”.

The Land of Milk and Honey Treaty has had long term implications that the control of the minerals within the metes and bounds of each country rests with its people. The Land of Milk and Honey Treaty is human right compliant in its entirety.

Convinced that the historic mission of the contracting parties is to offer to man a land of freedom and a favorable environment for the development of his personality and the realization of his just aspirations and Independent Human rights;

Conscious that the historic mission has already inspired numerous agreements, whose essential value lies in the desire of the people to live together in peace and through their mutual understanding and respect for the independence of each member, to provide for the betterment of all, its independence, equality and law;

Convinced that compacts by and between the people in Social Compact is an indispensable condition for the stability, peace and development of the these Articles;

Confident that the true significance of solidarity and good neighborliness can only mean the consolidation on this continent, of a Compact of individual freedom of thought and social compact based on respect for the unalienable rights of people;

Persuaded that its prosperity and its contribution to the progress of the prosperity of its neighbors and of the world will increasingly require intensive continental cooperation;

Resolved to persevere in the noble undertaking that the struggle has conferred upon the contracting parties, whose principles and purposes it solemnly affirms;

Article 1
REPELLING INTERFERENCE

Each contracting party shall repel any attempt of any third party to justify the invasion of the contract by and between the people and their government in violation of Article 21 section one of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) for the purpose of gaining unlawful control of the minerals without just compensation to the people thereof. Split titles to property shall be repelled.

Article 2
POSITIVE GOVERNMENT RELATIONS

Each contracting party shall express the will of the people through its elections which forms its Government and its Sovereign Public Bank. The people contracted with their government through declaration, oath or affirmation or as otherwise provided shall retain the right as expressed within Article 21 section 1 of the UDHR.

Article 3
ROYALTIES

Each contracting party agrees to collect royalties on behalf of the people, through the terms as provided by the code that governs a certain license for the exclusive use, manufacturing, reforming, altering, or otherwise used exclusively by a private party for the purpose of producing goods for consumers. The royalties shall be apportioned equally among the elderly, and or otherwise qualified to receive Social Assistance in accordance with Article 22 of the UDHR.  

The royalties can be collected at the time the manufacturer sells the goods to the retailers under a percentage thereby avoiding direct contact with the people. If the IRS never has to collect taxes and starts collecting royalties on behalf of the people,the IRS is no longer considered a tyrant collection agency. The people would never see an IRS agent in their lifetime. The producers would deal with the IRS directly or through agents. The Government is funded  every time the consumer buys a product from a retailer which forces the politicians to do their job by creating jobs and market places. If revenue falls, the IRS confronts the politicians. The retailer does not spend time and resources collecting sales tax and looking for alternatives to paying employment taxes etc. The people do not spend most of their time avoiding direct taxes through overseas tax schemes. There is more money for the people to spend on products which creates more jobs and relieves the Social Security system of fraudulent claims. Mental stress is relieved because the royalties are apportioned equally among Social Security Administration accounts once the Government bills are paid and the people can request personal bills are paid out of their own royalty fund in Social Security. IRS agents are loved and supported and wipes out a million pages of incomprehensible IRS policies. Everyone wins and all social and funding issues between the people and Government are resolved. (the resolution goes in a hundred different directions at the same time in a positive light, too many to write in this article)

Article 4
CERTAIN IMMUNITY

The producers shall enjoy certain immunity under the license governed by the doctrine of codification to reduce the impairment of production to be determined by the contracting parties within their own spheres and governed by the UDHR or as otherwise provided for the purpose of protecting the producer from certain injustices against producers committed by consumers and their representation.

This makes it very attractive for producers to become producers and therefore creates jobs.

Article 5
CERTAIN PROTECTIONS

The consumers shall enjoy certain protections from producers seeking to diminish their quality of life. The protections shall be funded by the collections of royalties and regulated by the contracting parties through Article 21, section 2 of the UDHR.

This gives the people a remedy that has standing against GMO’s and other harmful products on the market.

The Land of Milk and Honey Treaty wherein its subject matter was inspired by the covenant made by and between the Israelites and their God, the UDHR and having experienced the oppression that is within the ability of man and his thinking, is hereby established.

Ratification and Entry Into Force

The present Treaty shall remain open for signature to the American Nations, States and countries on the American Continent and the countries from the other six continents which shall be ratified in accordance with their respective constitutional procedures for proper recognition. The instrument of ratification as written in Spanish, English, Portuguese, French or other texts of which are equally authentic, shall be deposited with the USC Chamber of Commerce, which shall transmit certified copies thereof to the Governments for purposes of publication. The instruments of ratification shall be deposited with the President of the USC Chamber of Commerce, which shall notify all signatories of said deposit. Any deposit by any country on the seven continents shall serve as a gateway for open commerce and trade by and between each country that is a signatory and makes said deposit of an instrument of ratification.

Notice: If anyone finds an negative issue with this resolution, please comment below this article.

02-04-2016

 

A Well Regulated Militia?


RoH-Post-Logo


Published on 02-20-2016 by THE REIGN OF THE HEAVENS SOCIETY POST


INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE

The second amendment of the constitution for the United States of America is very short and not defined in its entirety basically because it’s meaning was common knowledge back when written: 

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

There are some folks that have defined that amendment rather well which opens a whole other side of thinking to the condition of the country as a whole: LINK

Quote:

There is no doubt the Framers understood that the term “militia” had multiple meanings. First, the Framers understood all of the people to be part of the unorganized militia. The unorganized militia members, “the people,” had the right to keep and bear arms. They could, individually, or in concert, “well regulate” themselves; that is, they could train to shoot accurately and to learn the basics of military tactics.

This interpretation is in keeping with English usage of the time, which included within the meaning of the verb “regulate” the concept of self- regulation or self-control (as it does still to this day). The concept that the people retained the right to self-regulate their local militia groups (or regulate themselves as individual militia members) is entirely consistent with the Framers’ use of the indefinite article “a” in the phrase “A well regulated Militia.” end quote

Quote:

It is an absolute truism that law-abiding, armed citizens pose no threat to other law-abiding citizens. The Framers’ writings show they also believed this. As we have seen, the Framers understood that “well regulated” militias, that is, armed citizens, ready to form militias that would be well trained, self-regulated and disciplined, would pose no threat to their fellow citizens, but would, indeed, help to “insure domestic Tranquility” and “provide for the common defence.”end quote

Whats missing in this whole debate?

The fact that the people are recognized by the second amendment in the States as Militia and not as the people. This line of thinking changes the whole dynamic of the system when looked at from the view of the United States.

Federal Courts recognize the “Defendant” and the “Plaintiff” which does not include and or excludes the Militia as recognized in the second amendment. If the court exclusively recognizes a defendant or plaintiff, yet the people are recognized as the Militia, then the issue of jurisdiction should always come up. If the framers understood that the people are the Militia in perpetuity, then the courts should recognize that fact and convert their documents to the correct parties or settle the country with a civilian population.

Lets go in a different direction in this line of thinking.

1: When the people started voting for a President, were they voting for a commander in chief of all the militia within the States? Is this the reason why executive orders seem to apply to the people and or “militia”? 

2: This line of thinking would also make the whole country a Military country where civilians literally do not exist according to the second amendment and its interpretation.

If all people are recognized as Militia, that would mean that no matter what people do for a living, they are recognized as Militia from the United States point of view, therefore we have a condition of Militia attacking Militia and attempting to bypass the second amendment by calling them anything like “anti-goverment” or “sovereign citizen”. Why would the people from the United States point of view attempt to change the status of the people from the recognized status of Militia? Why call the Militia residents and US Citizens?

Gun Control would be defined as an attempt to dis-arm the Militia. Militia trying to dis-arm other militia through gun control methods are in violation of the second amendment.

The second amendment was designed to stop wars because if everyone is Militia from the commander in chief to every man, woman and child, then there is no one to vilify or kill.  The second amendment did not deal with religion, or politics, it dealt with people and all of their differences which brought them altogether to stop killing each other.

The thinking behind everyone being recognized as Militia means that when someone is murdered, it is recognized as one Militia member murdering another which is a threat to domestic tranquility. Murder literally means treason as defined under the second amendment. 

When police kill or the police are killed, that literally means Militia members killing militia members according to the second amendment. The second amendment removes the privileged class of people concept from society.

The funny part of this whole scenario is that the people attempting to destroy the second amendment to establish a New World Order, are literally trying to destroy the the original concept and intent of a New World Order — one based on mutual status, respect and peace.

“Compartmentalization is the greatest threat to domestic tranquility”

02-19-2016

Hillary Clinton does not qualify for president!


RoH-Post-Logo


Published on 03-24-2016 by THE REIGN OF THE HEAVENS SOCIETY POST


INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE

Presented by the Government of The United States of America

Hillary Clinton (hereinafter “Hillary”) does not qualify to hold any office of a president due to the fact that Hillary has already served two consecutive terms in the aforementioned office. 

1: Hillary is married to William Jefferson Clinton.

2: Under the marriage contract, Hillary is the same as William Jefferson Clinton:

Quote: EPHESIANS 5
31“For this cause a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.” end quote

3: In accordance with the contract (constitution), there was an amendment adopted wherein does it read:

Quote: The Twenty-second Amendment, adopted in 1951, prohibits anyone from ever being elected to the presidency for a third full term. end quote

4: Therefore, Hillary and William Jefferson Clinton are running for a third full term  of which neither of them have the authority to do in accordance with the contract.

5: For those that are anti-marriage and believe the woman is separate from the man regardless of vows etc. This next quote is for you…

Quote:

Courtesy Library of Congress.

Unlike the President, the role of the First Lady is not addressed in the Constitution. Both the role of the Presidential spouse and the title have shifted and formalized over the history of the United States. The spouse of the President is not elected to serve and yet, because the White House is both the residence and the office of the President, public service is inherent to the role. Traditionally, the wife of the Presidents served as the hostess and was in charge of all things domestic; but that role has grown. Beyond defining the role of First Lady, even counting them is difficult as more women than just the spouses of the Presidents filled the role of White House Hostess, particularly in the 19th century. Widowers and bachelors and others would call upon surrogates to fill the role when a spouse was unavailable — a role that itself is a social surrogate for many of the ceremonial functions of the Presidency.

http://www.georgewbushlibrary.smu.edu/The-President-and-Family/Laura-W-Bush/The-First-Lady-and-Her-Role.aspx   end quote

6: Technically the first lady, the position that Hillary took in the White House for two terms is specifically connected to the presidency and therefore has already served for two terms in the White House in the same office Hillary is trying to take for a third full term. Since Hillary is still married to William Jefferson Clinton, technically William Jefferson Clinton is attempting to maneuver his way around the two term limit through his wife and therefore is openly defying the terms of the office in front of the whole world. 

7: It is common knowledge that the oligarchy has been playing musical chairs with various offices for the past 50 years and have been watching each others back in certain cases. However, it appears that someone miscalculated this move made by the Clinton family.

8: Any election won by Hillary cannot be honored.

9: Any other woman in the country that has been a permanent resident of the United States for a period of 14 years would qualify to hold the office of the presidency except Hillary Clinton.

10: Example: If a man works for a period of time and receives a pension after retirement, even if that man dies, the surviving wife will still receive the full benefits of the pension after the death of her husband because they are considered one in the same in the eyes of the law.

Presented by the Government of The United States of America

03-24-2016

 

National Security Breach by creatures of the state!


RoH-Post-Logo


Published on 02-04-2016 by THE REIGN OF THE HEAVENS SOCIETY POST


INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE

Please watch this short 27 second clip from CBS News.

 

 

Presented by the Government of The United States of America!

Many people have claimed that the No Titles of Nobility clause within each State constitution means that no one is to accept a Title of Nobility from any King or Prince etc…

That may be correct, however the clause within each constitution is not adequate enough for what you are about to see within this presentation.

Famous Quote: “Because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many citizens, because of their respect for what only appears to be a law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights, due to ignorance”.‖2 2US vs. Minker. 350 US,179 p187.

We figured out that the constitution cannot enter into any court room because of this clause: “No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States; and no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State”.

Many people concentrate on the word “Title” and never look up the word “Nobility”. In order to understand this clause is to look at it in reverse:

NOBILITY. An order of men in several countries to whom privileges are granted at the expense of the rest of the people.

As we have said before, to change an entity is to change its form. The word “State” is not the same as the word “STATE”.

The main issue is whether a man can plead for another in any cause for a fee. When the country first started, this practice was prohibited. Then expanded to “friend in council” where a fee was also prohibited.

Then the practice expanded to where someone could plead for a entity and represent it. Then the corporation became a natural person under definition. Then it became the practice to plead for the individual. This happened over many years by statute, not by any constitution. The practice is called “Creatures of statute (also known as creatures of the state) are legal entities, such as corporations, created by statute”.

Creatures of statute may include municipalities and other artificial legal entities or relationships.[1] Thus, when a statute in some fashion requires the formation of a corporate body—often for governmental purposes—such bodies when formed are known as “creatures of statute.” The same concept is also expressed with the phrase “creature of the state.

The term “creature of statute” is most common to the United States.
Many people already know that the UNITED STATES is not the same as the United States. So, that would mean that the UNITED STATES is a creature of statute.

The importance of a corporate body, regardless of its exact function, when such a body is a creature of statute is that its active functions can only be within the scope detailed by the statute which created that corporation. Thereby, the creature of statute is the tangible manifestation of the functions or work described by a given statute. The jurisdiction of a body that is a creature of statute is also therefore limited to the functional scope written into the laws that created that body. Unlike most (private) corporate bodies, creatures of statute cannot expand their business interests into other diverse areas.

This means that if the creature has within it Attorney’s fees, then it is required to pay attorney’s fees. If the creature has within the statute that persons can be represented which is implied by the term Attorney’s fees, then we know that the constitution did not authorize its creation and therefore has been created by a privileged class of people?

Example:

The STATE OF FLORIDA is a creature of statute and not the state itself therefore the creature is represented by a prosecutor that is a member of the bar and paid a fee for the representation of the creature of the state created by statute and not authorized by the State of Florida constitution itself.

Further, an ENACTMENT CLAUSE IN THE NAME OF THE CREATURE is for the creature itself and not an enactment of the state.
Example: “Be It enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:“ now what happens when you do this: “BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA”  You changed the enactment clause by statute and placed the creature under a title in the name of  “STATE OF FLORIDA OR FL”.

This clause is a part of the statute which indicates the legislative authority by which the statute is made and its effective date. Some state constitutions specify the enacting clause for legislation, and such legislation becomes void without the enacting clause. Generally, enacting clauses appear in historical or legislative notes in codifications of statutes.

Whoops, Some state constitutions specify the enacting clause for legislation, and such legislation becomes void without the enacting clause.

What could this mean? Could it mean that a creature of statute was created on paper? Could it mean that all statutes created under another ENACTING CLAUSE could be for the benefit of a privileged class of people and no one else?

The Lawyers never accepted any titles of nobility. What they did was create a nobility under a title using a creature of statute thereby never accepting a foreign title. There was not any clause in any constitution that forbids creating a nobility under a title/creature created by statute. However, there is a law that forbids creating a STATE within a state which is what the lawyers violated.

The STATE was created on paper and therefore is a mere image of the original state, however has real life applications and consequences in its enforcement.

Now does this famous quote make sense now?
“Because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many citizens, because of their respect for what only appears to be a law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights, due to ignorance”.‖2 2US vs. Minker. 350 US,179 p187.

The state constitutions do not recognize anyone pleading for another in any court case because people have a right to face their accuser, not their agent. That is why constitutions are not allowed in any court because it null and voids the lawyers within the court trying to practice law which is not recognized by the state constitutions nor any constitution of the United States of America.

The people are not recognized as having access to any state constitution because they are without an oath or affirmation to it and are considered denizen and banished from the state. The Statutes at Large for the State of South Carolina: 

12654324_994359363964580_5788167796616633440_n

 

Oath or affirmation to the State equals immunity from the lawyers courts and STATUTES under THEIR TITLE, STATE OF FLORIDA of which they have created a NOBILITY under a title within a State for themselves at the expense of the people. The expense that is being spent is the respect that the people have for the law itself while deceived into respecting the appearance of law for the benefit of a privileged class of people.

The privileged class of people, through their devises have enforced the homelessness of millions of people through their creatures of statute and boast of running the country and making its laws to benefit a privileged few in front of the view of the public. Therefore through their De-stablization and multiple human rights violations have declared themselves a National Security risk and therefore have knowingly and willfully caused the National Security Breach and contempt of every constitution and the Articles of Confederation of 1781 and as amended August 5th, 2015.

Presented by the Government of The United States of America!

02-04-2016

 

 

National Security Breach by creatures of the state! Part 2


 

RoH-Post-Logo


 

Published on 02-06-2016 by THE REIGN OF THE HEAVENS SOCIETY POST


 

INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE

Presented by the Government of The United States of America!

In part one of this series of presentations, the subject matter consisted of Titles of Nobility and how a nobility has been created within a title. Part 2 will expound on some of the very slight changes that have been made to achieve this secular nobility of a privileged class of people within America.

We are going to use some examples of documents from the State of Maryland. The State of Maryland is just an example because this same example exists within all of the States of the Union.

Here is an example:

In 1867 and before, the style of the enactment clause for the State of Maryland is this: ” Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Maryland”.  Example document from that period: LINK   If they wanted to extend sections to enactments they would write Further be it enacted… or “And be it enacted” which is an addition to existing law.  LINK

In 2004, it all changed to this: “BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND”  and the explanation for the all caps is an addition to existing law. LINK to a proposed BILL because they don’t bother to place the actual statute on the internet. The State of Maine is a good example: People are supposed to accept this document as a statute: LINK

It has been witnessed that all of the STATES have changed the enactment clauses to all capital letters. Caps in Eng­lish de­scend di­rectly from the Latin al­pha­bet. So why place a Latin alphabet in an English document when there are no exceptions for all capital letters in an enactment clause nor in the 8 rules of capital letters in the English language: LINK

When anyone enters a foreign language into any document the subject matter of the document becomes foreign. Therefore a foreign STATE has been created in a State. Example: A copy of the 1867 constitution of the State of Maryland in the Declaration of Rights it reads We, the people, LINK yet when it was amended in 2015, it now reads WE, THE PEOPLE,  LINK

Now, WE, THE PEOPLE are under a foreign language of Latin and placed themselves into a foreign STATE from the original State of Maryland, then absorbed the original courts into circuit and District Courts.The official language of the United States is English.

It goes even further, that same privileged class of PEOPLE are also sticking bills to the people of the State of Maryland without their consent under Chapter 239 of the acts of 2001 Section 1, paragraph 1: LINK

That is called slavery and or forced labor after the act of trafficking of persons to a foreign STATE.

Further, if the privileged class of PEOPLE desire their own foreign STATE, it is a violation of the Law of Nations to attempt to use the former State or any of its people to pay their bills: Ҥ 4.What are sovereign states.Every nation that governs itself, under what form soever, without dependence on any foreign
power, is a Sovereign State, Its rights are naturally the same as those of any other state. Such are the moral persons who live together in a natural society, subject to the law of nations. To give a nation a right to make an immediate figure in this grand society, it is sufficient that it be really sovereign and independent, that is, that it govern itself by its own authority and laws.”

Further, an unequal alliance has not been established by and between We, the people and WE, THE PEOPLE as written in section 5 of the Law of Nations. “§ 5. States bound by unequal alliance.”

This situation would mean the the privileged class of PEOPLE would be responsible for their own debts. Therefore, the privileged class of PEOPLE are responsible for the STATE AND NATIONAL DEBT.

Further, every time the privileged class of PEOPLE enforce their foreign laws against the people, that would be considered, human trafficking, forced labor, kidnapping, theft, unlawful imprisonment, unlawfully detained, and a host of other crimes too many to list here. 

The so-called “corrections in their private detention centers” benefit a privileged class of PEOPLE because they are sticking the Bill for their services to the original State of Maryland. We, the people of the State of Maryland are being subjected to the privileged class of PEOPLE’S laws that do not apply to We, the people of the State of Maryland because they are written in a foreign language. This mess all started with the cause of Pleading for another for a fee.

Lets explore some speculations:

What if those same privileged class of PEOPLE were looking to replace the existing slave pool with Muslims. Further, F.E.M.A. camps were built to exterminate the current slave pool and replace them with Islamic slaves to work in the factories and extend profits. LINK     LINK 

Slavery is legal in Islam.  This same privileged class of PEOPLE are not unfamiliar with building Nations within Nations or STATES within States where Islam is a foreign nation to the United States and is strictly forbidden from establishing itself in the United States.

Think about the police officers that pledged themselves to uphold STATE statutes and place their lives on the  line everyday thinking they are serving the original State when in fact that are serving a foreign STATE to the detriment of their own families, possibly themselves and everyone they know today.

We can go further with this line of thinking, however, it would be redundant to do so. There will be people that would say that differences in wording does not mean anything, however, it does mean something in documents that pertain to the law.

Presented by the Government of The United States of America!

02-07-2016