Introducing a International Tort Claim against the United States and the United States of America!

THE REIGN OF THE HEAVENS SOCIETY POST


Published on 01-31-2017 by THE REIGN OF THE HEAVENS SOCIETY POST


International Public Notice

The International Tort Claim will be served within the next couple of days in hard copy to the proper parties.

This International Tort Claim is not about money. There is a lot of information in the nine pages and could expand as the need arises. If there are people that would like to sign it, this newspaper can create a signature page. Please leave a comment if you would like to sign this International Tort Claim and a page will be created.

International Tort Claim Link

Update: A signature page has been created for those claimants that would like to join the International Tort Claim. LINK

01-31-2017

The sovereign citizen movement and ideology is now being enforced within the courts of Minnesota and its federal courts!!


American Herald-Logo-Grey

 

Published on 10-20-2016 by The American Herald


International Public Notice

The Government of The United States of America is now accusing Minnesota for violations of Human Rights and charges are expected to be file within the Human Rights Tribunal as early as today.

Allegedly, Minnesota nor any of the other 49 states can prove that their union is legal that was created after the civil war. This means that the states are notwithstanding on anything they are doing under any compact agreements that have been made. The Compact Agreements made by and between the states are not regulated in anyway by anyone.

Today’s compact agreements are riddled with human rights violations and since Minnesota likes to say in one case it does not have jurisdiction over American Nationals within the States of the Union while in other cases it keeps and places an American National under pain compliance, it appears that Minnesota is known as a bi-polar state.

The properly vetted claim of first in time first in right by the Government of The United States of America places the United States Government in the back seat along with the states and union it created.  The United States Government is looking at so many human rights violations, it will remain in debt for its crimes for many generations to come.

Mr. Derusha filed a motion to dismiss under Title 28 rule 17b. The local courts ignored the motion and a AO91 form has been filed at least four times. The local chief judge has ignored the AO 91 and so have at least 3 federal judges. This means that there are judicial corporate officers claiming and identifying themselves as sovereign citizens.

The sovereign citizen movement and its ideology is now being enforced in various courts in Minnesota and other states by court officers. They believe the court rules do not apply to them nor are they subject to upholding human rights. Many of the sovereign citizens within the courts are there for the money and create many court schemes to collect money from unknowing victims. The sovereign citizens within the courts believe they are a privileged class of people and the law does not apply to them. These sovereign citizens within the courts and various law enforcement agencies harass people for payoffs. They look for bribes for the privilege of using Title 28 rule 17b and various other courts rules and remedies.

It is best to hear it from their own mouth:

These self proclaimed sovereign citizens are extremely dangerous and pay people through its political parties to cause riots to further their political agenda which is nothing more than terrorism by definition in patterns and practices. These sovereign citizens reach all the way to the Department of Justice in some cases. Their human rights violations are being addressed and the violators will be brought to justice. 

LINKS TO THE CASE FILES

under the heading: “Government of The United States of America v Minnesota” about 6 entries from the top.

10-20-2016

Spineless Soros (hereinafter “SS”)

American Herald-Logo-Grey

Published by the American Herald on 10-07-2016


George Soros, also known as Spineless Soros (hereinafter “SS”) has the audacity and made a decision to write a check to Black Lives Matter members, some 50 to 60 of them to go and beat up one 17 year old boy because he posted “Blue Lives Matter” on Facebook. LINK

What kind of man sits in his safe office, hides behind his bank account and gives himself permission to attempt to start a race war among children?

What kind of man would give himself permission to push his own sick agenda on others using violence and taking advantage of the less fortunate? Meanwhile, Manhattan Island is harboring a international criminal and protecting this sick twist.

If the man had a spine, he would use his fortune to improve the lives of people less fortunate and rebuild everything that the present federal representatives have been neglecting like simple infrastructure.

Instead, SS decides to push the sickest agenda he can find and ever thought up by man and use his blessings and fortune to become a living nightmare to the world itself.

Where are the Manhattan Island prosecuting attorney’s, the police, anyone with a spine to clean their own house.

Who knows? However, there is an afterlife where the bank account won’t matter SS, and there is nothing you can do about that.

10-07-2016

Brooklyn Bridge New York City Hall Slanders the American Herald!

American Herald-Logo-Grey


Published on 08-18-2015 by the American Herald


INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE

The American Herald receives some bizarre comments on various articles published by the American Herald on a daily basis.

Today, a comment that was written was outright slanderous in nature. The most interesting part of the comment was its source. The comment was posted on a particular article involving a woman claiming to be a Article 4 free inhabitant. Although the video was entertaining to some and others were disturbed over the videos content. The whole article sparked some real controversy among the people. LINK TO ARTICLE

The comment posted today is as follows:

“You are not making “observations” as you out and out lie. You are another pathetic free inhabitant with a keyboard.”

Please keep in mind that this article is over a year old and the original video had been removed from youtube. So the American Herald staff decided to look up the IP location of the individual making the comment and find another posting of the video on youtube. Here is what we found:

Comment response from the American Herald:

“Well Mr. West Ford, it appears your ip address links you to the Brooklyn Bridge New York City Hall. How are you boys doing today? Just for your information, we do know that you are attempting to plant a seed that the term “inhabitant” is a bad, bad thing. However, this newspaper happens to know that residents are supposed to take an oath or affirmation of allegiance to obtain the status of inhabitant and then municipal citizens wherein they do receive a dividend check every year and are not liable for any debts. Those debts are passed on to the U.S. state residents. It is also known that they do obtain a United States nationality after that process is complete. It is also known that John F. Kennedy was killed for exposing that fact and attempting to make the exiled people a citizen again. Based on your comment, it appears that the Brooklyn Bridge New York City Hall is attempting to slander the American Herald in an attempt to hide these crimes against the UDHR and many other international laws by simply using the term inhabitant in its comment. Thank you for submitting more evidence as to identifying the parties that are perpetrating these crimes of slavery and owning slaves, today known as U.S. state residents. Thank you for your confession on behalf of the Brooklyn Bridge New York City Hall. Have a good day!”

The article itself, written by the American Herald does affect and implicates  the taser industry as selling, promoting and requiring torture devices to be used on residents of the U.S. states under the term “pain compliance”.

For those that believe that the American Herald is against the police and siding with the crazy Article 4 lady, is notwithstanding.

However, according to the response by the American Herald, all the cop had to do to really help was offer to take the couple to the nearest county judge to take an oath of allegiance. It would be that simple. Yes, she would have moved from resident to inhabitant and then to citizen and gain dividends check every year. Yes, the driver’s license would not be required and everything would have ended very peacefully. Instead, ignorance was equal on both sides and therefore renders the American Herald a third party neutral observer.

08-18-2016

The Grand Jury Conspiracy!

American Herald-Logo-Grey


Published on 04-05-2016 by the American Herald


International Public Notice

As keepers of the constitution for the United States of America it is the duty of the Keepers to inform the people.

Presented by the Government of The United States of America!

The Government of The United States of America published a International Public Notice on 03-30-2016 about supporting the people in a certain action taken: LINK

Upon further investigation into and county grand juries, it is an obligation to inform the people on some findings by the Government of The United States of America when it comes to the subject matter of the grand jury. 

First: There is an organization doing business as National Liberty Alliance “NLA”. Their interpretation of a certain case known as:

UNITED STATES, Petitioner v. John H. WILLIAMS, Jr.
504 U.S. 36 (112 S.Ct. 1735, 118 L.Ed.2d 352)
UNITED STATES, Petitioner v. John H. WILLIAMS, Jr.
No. 90-1972.
Argued: Jan. 22, 1992. Decided: May 4, 1992. LINK

is being addressed in this presentation.

There are some liberties taken by NLA that does not exist within the case cited and used as a foundation of the organizations activities. 

The first paragraph of a document published by NLA reveals quite a bit about the mind set of the organization. LINK

Quote: “We the people have been providentially provided legal recourse to address the criminal conduct of persons themselves entrusted to dispense justice. In the Supreme Court case of United States v. Williams, 112 S.Ct. 1735, 504 U.S. 36, 118 L.Ed. 2d 352 (1992), Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority, confirmed that the American grand jury is neither part of the judicial, executive nor legislative branches of government, but instead belongs to the people. It is in effect a fourth branch of government “governed” and administered to directly by and on behalf of the American people, and its authority emanates from the Bill of Rights.” end quote
 

NLA claims: “Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority, confirmed that the American grand jury is neither part of the judicial, executive nor legislative branches of government, but instead belongs to the people.”

This next quote is what the case really says:

“Rooted in long centuries of Anglo-American history,” Hannah v. Larche, 363 U.S. 420, 490, 80 S.Ct. 1502, 1544, 4 L.Ed.2d 1307 (1960) (Frankfurter, J., concurring in result), the grand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the branches described in the first three Articles. It ” ‘is a constitutional fixture in its own right.’ ” United States v. Chanen, 549 F.2d 1306, 1312 (CA9 1977) (quoting Nixon v. Sirica, 159 U.S.App.D.C. 58, 70, n. 54, 487 F.2d 700, 712, n. 54 (1973)), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 825, 98 S.Ct. 72, 54 L.Ed.2d 83 (1977). In fact the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people. See Stirone v. United States, 361 U.S. 212, 218, 80 S.Ct. 270, 273, 4 L.Ed.2d 252 (1960);”

The case makes no reference that the grand jury belonged to the people, it said that the grand jury serves as kind of a buffer, but “kind” could mean anything.

Next quote by NLA:

“It is in effect a fourth branch of government “governed” and administered to directly by and on behalf of the American people, and its authority emanates from the Bill of Rights.”
 

1: If an entity is not textually assigned, it cannot be a fourth branch of anything.

2: If the grand jury is not textually assigned and claims sovereignty and independence, it cannot claim power of attorney on and behalf of the American people. This claim by NLA violates the political rights of everyone and multiple power of attorney contracts that many people have all over the country. Further, the Bill of Rights was created to protect the States from the federal, not to protect the people. A federal construct is a union of states, wherein a National Government is a Government of people.

The whole theory of people coming together as a group and calling itself a grand jury on a county level does not hold water without the authority of the people. Further, for a group of people to come together and claim power of attorney for the whole country is what is known as communism.

On the other hand, a grand jury under the 5th amendment of a Bill of Rights being controlled by a private membership association “PMA” (Bar Association members) has created a situation where the PMA can manipulate many courses of action on behalf of one organization over another whether the targeted party is guilty or not. Further, that power of the 5th amendment grand jury can also be used by secret societies because of the nature of its creation requires secrecy and independence. Once independent and secret, it has nothing to do with the people it investigates and jurisdiction can be challenged as to whether the particular grand jury has any rights whatsoever due to the nature of its proceedings. The grand jury has to be assigned to a particular people before it has authority.

A grand jury is not any different then a private court operated by a private membership association. If the grand jury is not textually assigned to anything other then itself, then the interpretation of its existence is flawed.

On page 48, Scalia writes, “The grand jury requires no authorization from its constituting court to initiate an investigation” and later, discussing compelling witness behavior he writes the grand jury must “appeal to the court when such compulsion is required.”

Scalia says the grand jury needs no authority from its constituting court to investigate but clearly, the grand jury needs the authority of the constituting court to exist. That is what constituting means…to create, authorize, establish, etc.

NLA can’t claim it is the U.S. courts, as they have grand juries of their own.

So, to come together as a group with no court recognition is not a grand jury…it’s a political organization mis-representing itself as a judicial body. The same can be said about a Bar Association, a private membership association running courts not recognized by the Bill of Rights nor any constitution. By  both organizations claiming power of attorney for the American people renders both political parties communists and fascists. There are too many human rights violations to mention in this article, however, anyone familiar with human rights can determine within a few minutes how many human rights are being violated when it comes to how the grand jury process is being used by the Bar Association and the  NLA. 

SOLUTION

The only way to solve the problems that have been created by both  aforementioned organizations is to write the grand jury into a county charter that the people have voted on and agree that no private membership associations are going to run or hijack their county government. Then pass an ordinance that the county cannot give money to any district judge if in fact the people want district judges in existence in their county. Isn’t it funny that the idea of writing a grand jury into existence that serves an assembly of the people on the county level never crossed the minds of either organization nor attempted to define “textually assigned”.

Just as human rights are used as political weapons internationally, so is the grand jury used as a political weapon within the U.S. 

Example county charter link

Presented by the Government of The United States of America!

04-05-2016

 

Hammond Family; are they being helped?


American Herald-Logo-Grey


Published on 01-12-2016 by the American Herald


INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE

Dear Readers:

Please watch this video and challenge yourself to figure out what is wrong with this picture?

 

The first thing that jumps out is where is the county court order to take the fence down?

The Militia that took the federal building that belonged to Harney County Oregon has yet to establish law and order.

1: If there is lawlessness in a county, militia has the same restrictions as any military. It also has the same duties and responsibilities as any military in the world, if a military force is going to invade an area to assist the people.  

2: The militia has to find the mayor, track down the charter, call for a town meeting and appoint temporary office holders, verify the population by taking a census, then setup elections while upholding law and order during the process with regular patrols and answering to the concerns of the people.

3: There are many people claiming that the constitution of the United States and the Bill of Rights are not followed by the republicans and democrats, however at the same time violate the same documents. If one side does not following two simple documents, that does not give rights to the other side to violate the same documents while trying to enforce the terms on others at the  same time (two wrongs do not make a right). If there are leaders lacking, it is up to the people to take the lead, however, in this case of the Oregon issue, it appears to be an arena and an episode of the Jerry Springer Show.

4: Where are the rights of the people that work for BLM and their trial?

A: Where is the indictment from the county grand jury?

B: Where is their defense council of which as human beings the BLM employees are entitled?

C: When was their day in court?

D: When did the trial occur to take the fence down?

E: What is the difference between the federal district courts and the people of Harney County, Oregon? 

Further, the last question is: Which side is not violating the human rights of everyone in America and the duties and responsibilities of man?

During this episode of the Jerry Springer Show in Oregon, the Hammonds went to jail and are still there. Law and order has not been established when there has been plenty of time to do so. The militia has diminished themselves to private free lance mercenaries, and now the U.S. Military has the legal right to intervene to re-establish law and order as a military force.

We are sure the Hammond family is thanking the Bundy family for this one. The whole process has turned into nothing more then propaganda machine for a constitution and a bill of rights that has not had any real force and effect since the Pan American union of 1933, and nothing has been accomplished as far as any hint of justice for the Hammond family, if in fact their human rights have been violated.

On the other hand, people are very well aware that there is corruption in the judicial system and every other branch of the company, however, stooping to their level accomplishes nothing. The people have to be better then their leaders in order to earn the right to lead.

01-12-2016

IN THE MATTER OF B.L.M. VS. THE HAMMOND FAMILY!


 

 

THE REIGN OF THE HEAVENS SOCIETY POST


Published on 12-31-2015 by THE REIGN OF THE HEAVENS SOCIETY POST


INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE

From: the office of the Governor for the Government of The United States of America

LINK TO CERTIFIED COPY

TO: Organization of American States
17th Street and Constitution Ave., NW
Washington, D.C., 20006-4499
United States of America
Main Telephone: 1 (202) 370 5000
Fax: 1 (202) 458 3967

TO: Oregon State Bar
16037 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd.
Tigard, OR
97224
Phone: (503) 620-0222
Facsimile: (503) 684-1366
info@osbar.org

TO: American BAR Association
Washington DC Office
1050 Connecticut Ave. N.W.
Suite 400
Washington, D.C. 20036
202-662-1000


 

It has been brought to the attention of the office of the Governor for the Government of The United States of America that there are certain Treaty and Human Rights Violations occurring within the Districts of the State of Oregon.

It has also come to the attention of the office of the Governor for the Government of The United States of America that these vast Human Rights and Treaty violations will cause a reversion of the chain of title of the jurisdiction in question back to the Land Act of 1775 of which exclusively
belongs to this Government. The original 13 states did not cede the disposal of property to any federal government and said lack of ceding authority does reflect within its current constitution.

Any and all claims of succession of said act came from 9 Baron Families that were and still are technically fugitives from justice wanted in Europe. These same 9 Baron families and their successors and assigns posed as 9 states when 13 states were needed to cede any authority and therefore have been privately and publicly trespassing through an instrument known as the Bureau
of Land Management (BLM) which claims to have been ceded authority from the Land Act of 1775.

It is apparent that the ranchers in two separate states that have been claiming that BLM is trespassing or claiming management rights that do not exist have been slandered in such a way through the media for the purpose of isolating those ranchers from receiving any assistance from the courts to uphold their legal rights in violation of Article II, Article IV, Article V, Article VI,
Article IX, Article XIV, Article XVII, Article XVIII, Article XXIII, of the AMERICAN DECLARATION OF THE RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF MAN.

Unfortunately, the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man is directly connected to the Bar Treaty whereby the ultimate responsibility of all of the obligations, responsibilities and liabilities of aforesaid violations fall upon the American Bar Association and the Oregon State Bar
which is required to be reviewed by the Organization of American States.
Failure to act on behalf of the Bar Treaty and the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man as it pertains to witnessing human rights violations and failure to stop and correct relieves the officers on duty of holding said positions that have benefited from said treaty and declaration.

The aforementioned violations are blatant against a small rancher family and an effort by the trustees of the 9 baron families to claim even a larger monopoly then already achieved.

This Government is not interested in the arguments of the case and does not take sides. However, this Government does claim to uphold Human Rights and does possess the first Human Rights Tribunal ever formed on American Soil under Article 8 of the UDHR. Something that the trustees of the baron families failed to accomplish over a period of 50 years. This Government also has Treaty jurisdiction since it has the ability to treat with other countries

According to the agreements that created the Pan American union which ultimately resides with the Organization of American States, it is incumbent upon all parties to act as sovereign entities and self govern accordingly.
Therefore it is recommended by this office that these basic human rights violations against the Hammond family in the State of Oregon are investigated in a timely manner by the Organization of American States, the American Bar Association and the Oregon State Bar.

Kind Regards,

The office of the Governor for the Government of The United States of America

John Harold Fulks