Statement from the National Government of the State of New Hampshire; Southern Border Crises!



                      PUBLISHED BY THE REIGN OF THE HEAVENS SOCIETY POST ON 10-25-2018

                                        INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE

             Reference: Migrant Caravan heading to the States of the Union Southern Border

The people of the State of New Hampshire find our fellow Texans and through the Charter of the American Continent, we find ourselves in the middle of International aggression. Our countries Southern Border is under attack, and our fellow Texans are in great need of assistance.

In accordance with the Law of Nations, the people of the State of New Hampshire have the absolute right to protect the Northern and Southern border by any means necessary. Anyone who volunteers to stand at post for the sole purpose of upholding their right under the Law of Nations is with authority. Anyone who stands against you is a traitor and will be treated as a traitor.

The National Government of the State of New Hampshire will do everything within its authority to protect the lives, property and any other threat that may arise in political retaliation against you or your family. Your right under the Law of Nations is your protection.

The Caravan invading our Southern Border must not succeed in their endeavors to violate the basic principles of the Law of Nations.

The National Government of the State of New Hampshire has accepted and acknowledged the obligations of the Law of Nations and stand in compact with the National Government of the State of Texas upon our ratification of the charter of the American Continent. An attack on the State of Texas is an attack on the State of New Hampshire.

The Organization of American States is in violation and dishonor and therefore does not stand for not speaking out against its charters violations. They sit there and do nothing and say nothing. The OAS is in dishonor against its own charter and has fallen.

We must all support and have the backs of the U.S. Military, our Militias and National Guard if it is their intent to protect the Borders, time will tell the truth.

Published by the office of the registrar for the National Government of the State of New Hampshire:

Email david.aubrey@nationalgovernment.net

David Keith Aubrey

10-25-2018

Introducing the New National Government of the State of New York!

 

     PUBLISHED BY THE REIGN OF THE HEAVENS SOCIETY POST ON 07-22-2018

                      INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE

The signatories of the National Government of the State of New York wasted no time in forming the new National Government in accordance with the Law of Nations and is hereby introduced to all countries in and of the world and the international community by the Government of The United States of America.

This effort of the people to remove themselves from the oppression of Vatican City is extremely self determined and there are two more States in the process of doing the same. Link!

If you would like to become a signatory to one of the States of the Union please go to:Link! and contact one of the temporary office holders to show you how.

07-22-2018

Introducing the new National Government of the State of Florida!

 

     PUBLISHED BY THE REIGN OF THE HEAVENS SOCIETY POST ON 07-15-2018

                      INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE

The signatories of the National Government of the State of Florida wasted no time in forming the new National Government in accordance with the Law of Nations and is hereby introduced to all countries in and of the world and the international community by the Government of The United States of America.

“We, the people of the State of Florida, in Convention, hereby assembled, on Tuesday
the 10th day of July, A.D. 2018, claiming the right of admission into the Union, as one
of The United States of America, and by virtue of the Treaty of Amity, Settlement, and
Limits between The United States of America and the King of Spain, ceding the
Provinces of East and West Florida to The United States of America; in order to secure
to ourselves and our posterity the enjoyment of all the rights of life, liberty, and
property, and the pursuit of happiness, do mutually agree, each with the other, to form
ourselves into a Free and Independent State, by the name of the State of Florida.”

LINK!

07-15-2018

The General Post Master Council signs an International Order as it pertains to addressing format!

 

PUBLISHED BY THE REIGN OF THE HEAVENS SOCIETY POST ON 05-23-2018

                                      INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE

The General Post Master Council for the Government of The United States of America signs an International Order as it pertains to addressing format!

Grounds for the International Order:
The grounds for this international order include but are not limited to the current addressing
system within the United States does not reflect the correct address. The addresses of all
public buildings do not include the term “United States” thereby claiming a jurisdiction but
not recognizing the United States as the country name by all of the fifty States of the Union
within The United States of America.

The current addressing format as established by the Bank of New York Mellon within its
software within the United States Postal Service distribution centers does not include the
United States within those address formats: Read More….

05-23-2018

The office of the Governor for the Government of The United States of America responds to “Executive Order Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption”!

                              PUBLISHED BY THE REIGN OF THE HEAVENS SOCIETY POST ON 12-26-2017


                                                           INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE

The office of the Governor for the Government of The United States of America had a few choice words for this particular executive order that obviously only applies outside of the States of the Union. LINK

The executive order is under unknown authority, however people seem to respond to these types of orders which sparked this response.

“As a government founded upon the principles of Human Rights, the Government of The United States of America, voices its gratitude to the Trump administration for bringing the subject of Human Rights to the public with the proclamation of December 8, 2017.

However, we feel it is important to point out that Executive Order #13107, “The Implementation of Human Rights Treaties”, was signed December 10, 1998, by William Jefferson Clinton, making the United States a party to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Of no less importance, in 2002 and 2003, George W. Bush, signed National Security Presidential Directive 22 , as well as Executive Order 13257 to combat trafficking in persons. Sadly, these directives and Executive Orders, now spanning two decades of existence, have produced no meaningful Human Rights compliant changes to the public policy of the United States.

Indeed, for those with eyes to see, it has not been Human Rights that have been promoted and implemented over the last twenty years, but rather, the police-state”.

READ MORE BY CLICKING THE LINK:
LINK

12-26-2017

The United States of America is declared a free State!

PUBLISHED BY THE REIGN OF THE HEAVENS SOCIETY POST ON 06-19-2017

INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE

The people for The United States of America hereby declare The United States of America a free State for the purposes of defining itself as a free country and free of des-potism within its metes and bounds of its territory as defined within the Articles of Confederation, as amended May 5th, 2015.

The definition of a free State included the original 13 (thirteen) colonies and those States that did not include slavery within its laws. However, the 50 (fifty) American States that became independent States derived from the status of the original 13 (thirteen) States have not operated as independent States and or free States since the inception of a foreign constitution and have not freed themselves from despotism for over 240 (two hundred and forty) years. The foreign constitution has within its wording and has been implemented to operate as a permanent Military occupation of The United States of America. The foreign constitution further violates the Law of Nations due to the fact that a Military occupation does not grant legal rights to the occupier to change the status of the people as one of its citizens.

What about the States of the Union? The States of the Union are within the territory of The United States of America and will function as free States when ready and able other wise their independence will derive from The United States of America until fully apprised of the Law of Nations and able to carry on their own international relations. The Union stays in tact under the Articles of Association of 1774 as amended in the present time.

“State” simply meant country from 1760 to present time;and “free” always meant free from despotism, rather than from some other country.

Now therefore, with this declaration in mind, there are certain rights that accompany free States and shall be enforced by the Government of The United States of America through legal and lawful means for the security of the next generation.

What does this mean?

1: The definition of a state as defined in 1864 by the municipal government of the District of Columbia is hereby abolished within The United States of America and the States of the union.

2: The charter of the judges is hereby deported in accordance with the Law of Nations.

3: This declaration removes resident alien status under a foreign power from the people thereby granting first in time and first in right status to choose their own status and destiny.

4: The lieutenancy of the Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulchre of Jerusalem are occupiers of a foreign country in direct conflict with the James Monroe Doctrine of 1823 and the Law of Nations thereby implementing an illegal trade embargo against the National Currency of the country. The illegal embargo is being implemented inside a box created on paper called a domestic jurisdiction and barring a National currency to be traded within it. This declaration holds the lieutenancy of the Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulchre of Jerusalem liable for these damages against The United States of America.

There are many other changes that will take place as this reality is realized after being notice of its existence. We will keep everyone notified of any updates and or resolutions that occur.

06-19-2017

Intangible Property

PUBLISHED BY the American Herald ON 06-09-2017

Written by Karen

Good day, to all of you faithful readers of the American Herald. I am honored to be a contributing Editor. I hope that you all will join me in making the American Herald the number one Newspaper in this great Nation.

Today we are covering the topic of “intangible property.” Webster defines intangible property as something intangible; specific: an asset (as goodwill) that is not corporeal. Not corporeal? You say, what does that mean? Well, Webster states that that means it is an asset without a material physical body. It is not not spiritual, and we all know that two nots represent a positive. So in other words, it is spiritual. Corporeal means substantial. Not immaterial. So, let us cut to the chase.

Intangible property is literally any thought, idea, or decision that is made on a personal level; on the canvas of the soul or mind. It is the seed that precedes the action that manifests into the material realm. It truly is just that simple. It is the first seed, if you will, that only becomes evident when it is acted upon. This could also include patents, trademarks, trade names, or copyrights. It is intellectual property. This is not a difficult concept when you consider what is private among parties, what is public, and what is strictly personal. In law, some of this intangible property rights are preconceived in the public realm. Where upon we’ve all agree to some intangible property rights, for example, grandparent’s rights. The problem is that statutory policies have been slanted to destroy intangible property rights, or personal choice, in favor of public policy. In other words, public policy has attempted to take a priority, and in some cases eliminate personal choice all together. Interesting of note, is that while researching various subjects, it is evident that many legal web sites do not even mention intangible property rights. If you’ll notice, they often skip over the concept.

Let us know what you think about this topic. Please feel free to leave your comments below. This article is not meant for legal advice. Any U.S. statutes are intentionally mute.

Political correctness is used to control our intangible property rights to language

A couple keywords to keep in mind while you read:

Tangible property: Property that you can own and hold and see and touch.

Intangible property: Property you own and can’t see, hold or touch. The right to use your tangible property. Like being able to drive your car whenever you’d like.

Do you know what it’s like to be silenced? Silenced until you compromise yourself and your beliefs to fit into what people think is politically correct or the “right way”?

Being politically correct is apparently more important than life itself. Somehow our intangible property right has shifted from certain words to other words without our knowledge or consent.

I had the exclusive intangible property right to a book blog. Sometime into it I started looking for a co-blogger to help me with upkeep and posting. When I decided on a blogger I specifically told said blogger in an e-mail that I don’t read or blog about the LGBT+ genre and community and if they agreed not to write about this subject among others on my blog I would gladly share my online space to write with me.

On their first post this blogger wrote a bit in their post about their sexual orientation. When I asked for them to remove it before publishing; this blogger questioned my exclusive intangible property rights to my blog.

The subject matter was personal information about this blogger I didn’t want on my blog. This blogger kept pushing and pushing for this topic to be put on my blog.

I stood my ground and said no. That was my blog and my space and they had their own blog to write about whatever they’d like. This blogger ended up quitting and proceeded to spread rumors about me because I wouldn’t give into their attempt to shift and control my intangible property rights to my blog. This blogger baited and switched me in an effort to control the direction of my intangible property to other political beliefs and agree to bend the terms and conditions that this blogger already agreed to prior to accepting the position as co-writer.

This blogger attempted to take away exclusive intangible property to my blog by attempting to control my intangible property right to specific words which formed beliefs that were not within the parameters of my own conscience.

I had a friend who was very angry at the world.

This friend would pick a fight with anyone who said the smallest thing -intentionally or not- that didn’t match with this friends political beliefs. This friend would get angry when someone wouldn’t automatically apologize for saying the wrong thing. This friend would become angry for asking why they were mad, as if someone should already know. They’d get angry when someone asked why you had to apologize for sharing an opinion. This friend would get angry when you wouldn’t use certain terms.

A while back I exercised my exclusive right to language and unintentionally said something that went against this friends political beliefs and when they called me out on it I asked them to explain why I was “wrong”. When they explained, I realized I didn’t agree with what they were saying and I stood by what I said. This friend spent days trying to tell me I was “wrong” and that I should apologize for what I said.

This friend took away my exclusive intangible property right to language itself by telling me my opinion was wrong and that their way was the only way.

I cut these people from my life without a second thought. These kind of people are draining and manipulative and if they couldn’t respect me and my voice I wouldn’t have them in my life.

I will not be silenced. I have a voice and it will be heard.

Introducing a International Tort Claim against the United States and the United States of America!

THE REIGN OF THE HEAVENS SOCIETY POST


Published on 01-31-2017 by THE REIGN OF THE HEAVENS SOCIETY POST


International Public Notice

The International Tort Claim will be served within the next couple of days in hard copy to the proper parties.

This International Tort Claim is not about money. There is a lot of information in the nine pages and could expand as the need arises. If there are people that would like to sign it, this newspaper can create a signature page. Please leave a comment if you would like to sign this International Tort Claim and a page will be created.

International Tort Claim Link

Update: A signature page has been created for those claimants that would like to join the International Tort Claim. LINK

01-31-2017

The sovereign citizen movement and ideology is now being enforced within the courts of Minnesota and its federal courts!!


American Herald-Logo-Grey

 

Published on 10-20-2016 by The American Herald


International Public Notice

The Government of The United States of America is now accusing Minnesota for violations of Human Rights and charges are expected to be file within the Human Rights Tribunal as early as today.

Allegedly, Minnesota nor any of the other 49 states can prove that their union is legal that was created after the civil war. This means that the states are notwithstanding on anything they are doing under any compact agreements that have been made. The Compact Agreements made by and between the states are not regulated in anyway by anyone.

Today’s compact agreements are riddled with human rights violations and since Minnesota likes to say in one case it does not have jurisdiction over American Nationals within the States of the Union while in other cases it keeps and places an American National under pain compliance, it appears that Minnesota is known as a bi-polar state.

The properly vetted claim of first in time first in right by the Government of The United States of America places the United States Government in the back seat along with the states and union it created.  The United States Government is looking at so many human rights violations, it will remain in debt for its crimes for many generations to come.

Mr. Derusha filed a motion to dismiss under Title 28 rule 17b. The local courts ignored the motion and a AO91 form has been filed at least four times. The local chief judge has ignored the AO 91 and so have at least 3 federal judges. This means that there are judicial corporate officers claiming and identifying themselves as sovereign citizens.

The sovereign citizen movement and its ideology is now being enforced in various courts in Minnesota and other states by court officers. They believe the court rules do not apply to them nor are they subject to upholding human rights. Many of the sovereign citizens within the courts are there for the money and create many court schemes to collect money from unknowing victims. The sovereign citizens within the courts believe they are a privileged class of people and the law does not apply to them. These sovereign citizens within the courts and various law enforcement agencies harass people for payoffs. They look for bribes for the privilege of using Title 28 rule 17b and various other courts rules and remedies.

It is best to hear it from their own mouth:

These self proclaimed sovereign citizens are extremely dangerous and pay people through its political parties to cause riots to further their political agenda which is nothing more than terrorism by definition in patterns and practices. These sovereign citizens reach all the way to the Department of Justice in some cases. Their human rights violations are being addressed and the violators will be brought to justice. 

LINKS TO THE CASE FILES

under the heading: “Government of The United States of America v Minnesota” about 6 entries from the top.

10-20-2016