No one is going to believe this!


American Herald-Logo-Grey


Published  on 04-11-2015 by the American Herald


Hello Readers,

You are not going to believe this!  A Human Rights case was heard by the Human Rights Tribunal- Link here! back in February 2015. The details of the case are basically the same as most cases. The difference is that one of the Human Rights Violators were “Freddie Mac”.

After the case was heard by the Human Rights Tribunal, the tort claimants were asked to file a quiet title action against the parties claiming the property in question and place the Human Rights Tribunal judgment in the case as evidence only.

This is what is not going to be believed. 

History: The Company passed a Patriot Act of 2001 decreeing all of the rights of the people null and void and domestic terrorists in the name of safety.  The Human Rights Tribunal saw the Patriot Act and decided that since the Company had given itself all of these extra liberties, then since all creations are equal, then the Human Rights Tribunal should have the exact same liberties as any other International entity. 

Now all of a sudden, Freddie Mac has Constitutional Rights and Due Process Rights under the United States Constitution (which by the way, there is no such entity or constitution in existence). Further, the State of Minnesota has become involved and attempting to regulate a International Proceeding under State statute thereby protecting Freddie Mac under a due process clause, and a full faith and credit clause which never really existed under government authority. Isn’t Freddie Mac federal?  Freddie Mac is seeking protection from the State of Minnesota from Human Rights violations. The federal venue is seeking state protections as a safe haven from Human Rights violations. 

On or about the middle of March, Maryland throws a human rights defender in jail for two years on a charge that had already been proven false in a previous hearing as retaliation for finding Freddie Mac in violation of Human Rights. Details on that case will be forth coming.

So, instead of fixing or correcting the Human Rights Violations, retaliation in a meeting was the conversation of the day.

It is believed that the people in America have outgrown the Company and its tactics of power grab and greed. The general sense is that the people are simply tolerating the Company with eyes rolling every time the Company or one of its officers come up in a conversation.  When anger turns to pity and a general sense of indifference, the Company has lost all moral standing because the corruption in the eyes of the people turns to finding ways to get away from it regardless of the consequences.

Self correction is the key to independence. Correcting oneself is the mark of an adult. Correction without council, correction without coercion or punishment shows character. Obviously all is lacking with the Company and the protest for correction ceases to be a viable answer.

Therefore, walking away and building something better is the only answer. If people cannot be corrected, nor will they correct themselves due to the ambition of winning, then all spiritual power is lost to those individuals that practice that juvenile behavior.  At this point, the Company employees are no different than those they profess to traffick and punish in their private prisons,

or Maybe the Human Rights Tribunal is just being a big meany head!

Read it for yourself here!

04-11-2015

A further look into “Perpetrators Exposed”


American Herald-Logo-Grey


Published on 04-03-2015 by the American Herald


Hello Readers,

The American Herald likes to go into depth on stories that are published by other newspapers from time to time. THE REIGN OF THE HEAVENS SOCIETY POST published an article entitled “Perpetrators Exposed” on April 1, 2015.

The article goes into some details about Manhattan Island. However, it did not dig deep enough. So the American Herald decided to put some scenarios together that would help those who read the other article get a bigger and better picture of the country as a whole and their personal situation.

Scenario #1

1: Lets explore the possibility that all U.S. citizens are correct that they have constitutional protections and that the United States is a country.

2: Lets explore the idea that we had a revolutionary war in 1776 under the declaration of independence, the Articles of Confederation was established in 1781, and replaced by a better constitution in 1789 where the Federal Government was born and the founding fathers had everyone’s best interest at heart.

3: It would mean in the present time that everyone that is born in the United States is a U.S. citizen with birth right citizenship and a resident of their State. Anyone that thinks they are not subject to federal law is an anti-government nut-job and a danger to the American Society. It would also mean that they hate democracy and are enemies and should be put down like every other rebel in history.  It would further make sense that the American people are very patient and tolerant of others and their political views and judge themselves as an advanced society that tolerate the ignorant and depraved.  Anyone that cannot see how great the people are and their constitution are terrorists that are jealous of the American lifestyle and their freedoms, and how dare they challenge the U.S. and its Military might.

IN scenario #1, that scenario should describe with relative accuracy as to the view of most Americans.

Here is a problem with scenario #1: On June 7, 1629,  the Netherlands settled Manhattan Island as a colony, and then an independent country that does claim the right to establish colonies of its own and has claimed the whole east coast and further to the Mississippi River which apparently still stands today.

Further, it established a central bank called the Bank of New York 1784, known today as the Bank of New York Mellon on Manhattan Island which means it is a foreign Bank to the U.S. because remember, the United States claims to be a country just like Manhattan Island.

Further, Manhattan Island is chartered from the  Netherlands which is also a foreign country to the United States if in fact the United States is a country of its own.

Further, this would also mean that Manhattan Island, being its own country tied to the Netherlands, finances the U.S. Treasury, and the U.S. Congress etc… and the U.S. Treasury circulates Manhattan Islands money which would technically mean that the federal reserve notes would be a foreign currency to the United States and the U.S.  The U.S. Treasury does have its own Treasury Note that is debt free and interest free but fails to circulate them to its own U.S. citizens.

If someone can correct this scenario, it would be appreciated. If all courts in the U.S. and the U.S. states will collect nothing but federal reserve notes, that would mean that the prisons, even public prisons would technically belong to Manhattan Island, a foreign country, foreign to the U.S.

Further, this would mean that the United States is allowing a foreign country to traffic all U.S. citizens to a foreign State in all court cases and other conditions. It would also mean that the United States is enforcing tax collections on U.S. citizens in the absence of any law requiring it to a foreign country thereby subjecting all U.S. citizens to a foreign law and social agreement.  The currency of a country defines its independence and its sovereignty.  The federal reserve note belongs and emanates from Manhattan Island, a foreign country. The United States also allows U.S. citizens to pay the debt of a foreign country and enslaves its citizens to that foreign country which means every arrest is an Article 9 violation by every Public Officer of the U.S. or U.S. state. “No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.”  Arbitrary: a :  not restrained or limited in the exercise of power :  ruling by absolute authority <an arbitrary government>

To be continued with scenario #2 in a future publishing.

04-03-2015

Scenario #1 and #2

The assembly for the Government of The United States of America passes a Social Assistance Act of 2015!


American Herald-Logo-Grey


Published by the office of the Secretary of State for the Government of The United States of America through the American Herald on 03-21-2015


On yesterdays assembly, a final draft of the Social Assistance Act of 2015 was passed by the assembly for the Government of The United States of America and the United States, in Congress assembled. The Act itself looks really sparse in its wording and appears that some sections are missing, for instance the voucher program and its impact, however all of the elements are there for the Social Assistance program to begin in its infancy.  It is sure that there will be additions and amendments by the Social Assistance Board based on trial and error. It is one great start to form an alternative to other programs that are broken. One thing is for sure, there is no other Social program like it anywhere and once fully understood, will be revered by many. The program itself solves a lot problems at once. 

03-21-2015


The Social Assistance Act of 2015


Officlal Assembly Record

Irrefutable evidence that the president of the American Society has unquestionable deep ties with Islam!


American Herald-Logo-Grey


Published on 03-21-2015 by the American Herald


Source: http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2015/03/20/obama_addresses_his_people_in_iran


Here we go again folks, irrefutable evidence that the president of the American Society has unquestionable deep ties with Islam! Be sure to read the article on the source link.

03-21-2015

The Government of The United States of America is declared a Home Rule Type!

American Herald-Logo-Grey


Published by the American Herald on 02-12-2015:


Dear Subscribers,

Many people have been asking what type of Government did the American Nationals form out of the original Confederacy, the answer is simple.

1: Home rule-noun: a form of government in which people have control in their own country, rather than being controlled by another country or empire.

2: Self-government-noun: a situation in which a country or region is governed by its own people, not by people from outside.

3: Self-rule-noun: the state in which a country or region is governed by its own people, not by people from outside.

Source: LINK

The confirmed American Nationals can definitely claim the National Government formed as the Government of The United States of America as a Home Rule National Government that elects its office holders. 

The Confederation Party would be classified the same as the Government as a Home Rule Political Party.

Another way to define a National Government is to declare what it is not:

Democratic Republic:

Usually, a “democratic republic” is not democratic and is not a republic. A government that officially calls itself a “democratic republic” is usually a dictatorship. Communist dictatorships have been especially prone to use this term. For example, the official name of North Vietnam was “The Democratic Republic of Vietnam.” China uses a variant, “The People’s Republic of China.”

02-12-2015