The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is hereby classified as Public Law within the States of the Union within The United States of America!

 

PUBLISHED IN THE Continental Free Press ON 09-20-2020

INTERNATIONAL AND NATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is hereby classified as Public Law within the States of the Union within The United States of America!

Article 1 Is now known as  Public Law 101-1

All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.

Article 2  Is now known as  Public Law 101-2

Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.

Article 3 Is now known as  Public Law 101-3

Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.

Article 4 Is now known as  Public Law 101-4

No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.

Article 5 Is now known as  Public Law 101-5

No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

Article 6 Is now known as  Public Law 101-6

Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.

Article 7 Is now known as  Public Law 101-7

All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.

Article 8 Is now known as  Public Law 101-8

Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.

Article 9 Is now known as  Public Law 101-9

No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.

Article 10 Is now known as  Public Law 101-10

Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.

Article 11 Is now known as  Public Law 101-11-1 and/or 2

(1) Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.

(2) No one shall be held guilty of any penal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a penal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the penal offence was committed.

Article 12 Is now known as  Public Law 101-12

No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

Article 13 Is now known as  Public Law 101-13-1 and/or 2

(1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state.
(2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.

Article 14 Is now known as  Public Law 101-14-1 and/or 2

as amended: 09-20-2020  Paragraph 2 striking out specific wording 

(1) Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution.
(2) This right may not be invoked in the case of prosecutions genuinely arising from non-political crimes. 

Article 15 Is now known as  Public Law 101-15-1 and/or 2

(1) Everyone has the right to a nationality.
(2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality.

Article 16 Is now known as  Public Law 101-16-1 and/or 2 and or 3

(1) Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.
(2) Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses.
(3) The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.

Article 17 Is now known as  Public Law 101-17-1 and/or 2

(1) Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others.
(2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.

Article 18 Is now known as  Public Law 101-18

Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.

Article 19 Is now known as  Public Law 101-19

Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

Article 20 Is now known as  Public Law 101-20-1 and/or 2 

(1) Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.
(2) No one may be compelled to belong to an association.

Article 21 Is now known as  Public Law 101-21-1 and/or 2 and or 3

(1) Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives.
(2) Everyone has the right of equal access to public service in his country.
(3) The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.

Article 22 Is now known as  Public Law 101-22

Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality.

Article 23 Is now known as  Public Law 101-23-1 and/or 2 and or 3 and or 4

(1) Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.
(2) Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work.
(3) Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection.
(4) Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.

Article 24 Is now known as  Public Law 101-24

Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay.

Article 25 Is now known as  Public Law 101-25-1 and/or 2 

(1) Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.
(2) Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.

Article 26 Is now known as  Public Law 101-26-1 and/or 2 and or 3

as amended: 09-20-2020  Paragraph 2 striking out specific wording 

(1) Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the basis of merit.
(2) Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups. 
(3) Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.

Article 27 Is now known as  Public Law 101-27-1 and/or 2

(1) Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits.
(2) Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he is the author.

Article 28 Is now known as  Public Law 101-28

Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.

Article 29 Is now known as  Public Law 101-29-1 and/or 2 

as amended: 09-20-2020  Paragraph 3 omitted

(1) Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.
(2) In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society.

Article 30 Is now known as  Public Law 101-30

Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.

If all previous Articles are violated the whole of all Public Laws herein are known as Public Laws-101 under this section.  

Hereby published by the committee of the National assembly for the Government of The United States of America, 

09-20-2020

OPEN LETTER TO THE STATE OF UTAH-ITS MEDIA AND THE WORLD!

 

PUBLISHED IN THE Continental Free Press ON 09-17-2020

INTERNATIONAL AND NATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE

OPEN LETTER TO THE STATE OF UTAH-ITS MEDIA AND THE WORLD

Attention Governor:

There is an issue with the State of Utah Judicial Branch wherein it has been taken over by a private membership association, meaning a club of men and women that simply took over the judicial branch of the State of Utah: https://www.utahbar.org/about/utah-bar-history-and-purpose/

“In 1985, the Utah State Constitution was amended to clarify that regulation of the legal profession should be performed under the Judicial Branch of government through the Utah Supreme Court, and the Bar was “perpetuated, created and continued” to perform regulatory and public interest services under the direction and control of the Supreme Court.”

Apparently the Supreme Court of the State of Utah (hereinafter: “Supreme Court”) granted itself broad powers of election, power of attorney of the people, and interpretation rights that allowed the Supreme Court to arbitrarily change the Constitution of the State of Utah by its own motion, election and power of attorney. The arbitrary actions by the Supreme Court was and still is a capital crime against the State of Utah.

Chapter III Law of Nations
Of the Constitution of a State, and the Duties
and Rights of the Nation in this respect.
§30. Of the
support of the
constitution
and obedience
to the laws.
“The constitution and laws of a state are the basis of the public tranquility, the firmest support of political authority, and a security for the liberty of the citizens. But this constitution is a vain <10> phantom, and the best laws are useless, if they be not religiously observed: the nation ought then to watch very attentively, in order to render them equally respected by those who govern, and by the people destined to obey. To attack the constitution of the state, and to violate its laws, is a capital crime against society; and if those guilty of it are invested with authority, they add to this crime a perfidious abuse of the power with which they are entrusted. The nation ought constantly to repress them with its utmost vigor and vigilance, as the importance of the case requires. It is very uncommon to seethe laws and constitution of a state openly and boldly opposed: it is against silent and gradual attacks that a nation ought to be particularly on its guard.”

The Capital Crime committed by the Supreme Court has been brought to the attention of the following people:

1: Shawn Farris
2: Marvin Bagley
3: William Leigh
4: Brody Kissell

Just to name a few. The Capital Crime remains hidden from the Public View.

Read More……CLICK HERE!

Bilateral Social Compact: Click Here! 

Hereby published by the committee of the National assembly for the Government of The United States of America, 

09-17-2020

The New Covenant is hereby identified as a part of the common law of The United States of America

 

PUBLISHED IN THE Continental Free Press ON 09-20-2020

INTERNATIONAL AND NATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE

The New Covenant as established by Yahweh through his son Jesus/Yahushua is hereby identified as a part of the common law of The United States of America and the States of the Union within The United States of America. 

Hereby published by the committee of the National assembly for the Government of The United States of America, 

09-20-2020

Anna Von Reitz sentenced to 37 years in the nearest detention center!

 

PUBLISHED IN THE Continental Free Press ON 09-18-2020

INTERNATIONAL AND NATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE

The evidence, proof and intent declared, demonstrates that the leader Anna Von Reitz and the Coordinators conspire through their actions of theft, wordings, workings, challenges to property without demonstration of title, theft of intellectual property, and the attempted theft of the metes and bounds and seaward bounds of a truly free people. All the while, Respondents, were attempting to insinuate the title of fiduciary for said free people. Evidence found upon their own website and cited here to clarify the facts.

WHEREAS, demands, statements of declaration and public notices to the effect that “we own you” need no other proof of the Respondents blatant institution of Slavery and Slavery Claims upon all Unions, Inhabitants, Americans, American Nationals, General Postmasters, Government Office holders of The United States of America, and any other foreign parties residing in America for other Governmental Businesses or Non-Governmental Organizations. This is a clear statement of Slavery by Respondents which is unacceptable to many people groups world-wide and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. This clear violation of Slavery therefore strips all Respondents of their rights of immunity.

WHEREAS, Respondents believe it possible to steal the metes and bounds and seaward boundaries of a sovereign nation and then declare that they are exempt or immune to any recourse or prosecution. This is an attempt to steal/usurp and be found innocent.

52 million dollar lien will be granted to the first one that will place Anna Von Reitz in their detention center with intent to hold for 37 years, no probation, no parole.   

Read More-Judgement and order: LINK

Source: LINK

Hereby published by the committee of the National assembly for the Government of The United States of America, 

09-18-2020

Automobile Association forms by transfer through American National Union Transportation Administration

Published by the American Herald on 09-07-2020

INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE

On September 6th, 2020, the American National Union Transportation Administration, (hereafter ANUTA), met in a planned pre-announced meeting in regards to forming the Automobile Association for The United States of America.

An official quorum was formed of current office holders of the department within ANUTA, along with an assembly.

After reading the proposed Automobile Association Constitution, By-Laws, and Rules of Order through shared document, in assembly, a discussion was held on the overall proposal.  All questions were answered and a motion was made as follows to form the Automobile Association for The United States of America.

“Motion by ANUTA Administrator, that ANUTA hereby transfers all rights, title, and interest to the Automobile Association for The United States of America to its  Constitution, By-Laws, and Rules of Order, thus dissolving the American National Union Transportation Administration.  This will dissolve ANUTA as a department within the American National Union, thus creating the Automobile Association within the American National Union, but stands autonomous“.

The motion was seconded by ANUTA office holder of Deeds and Recordings, and passed and carried with no objection.  The record was kept by notes and recording to be published in a timely manner.

It was so ordered to make a public notice that this Automobile Association for The United States of America will function as a Private Membership Association, and notification will be brought forth through announcement, publication, and newsletter type communication platform to all who are members of the American National Union as American Nationals and residents of The United States of America.

Further, details will be forth coming on how to join.

Published by the committee for the American National Union of The United States of America. 

AFFIDAVIT RENOUNCING U.S. CITIZENSHIP!

 

PUBLISHED IN THE Continental Free Press ON 09-04-2020

INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE

 

Source: snoop4truth 

David Lester Straight recommends using his form “affidavit” to renounce U.S. citizenship so as to avoid application of U.S. laws, U.S. tax obligations and U.S. financial obligations. Straight does not know that his affidavit alone will not work to renounce U.S. citizenship and would not operate to absolve a person of U.S. law, U.S. tax obligations or U.S. financial obligations even if it did work to renounce U.S. citizenship.

In “IN RE YUSKA, Bankr. Court, Iowa 2017″, the court held, ” [The affiant’s] attempt to unilaterally declare himself free of citizenship and its responsibilities WAS … INEFFECTIVE. HE CANNOT CONTINUE TO RESIDE HERE IN THE UNITED STATES AND CONTINUE TO ENJOY THE BENEFITS OF CITIZENSHIP WHILE SIMULTANEOUSLY CLAIMING HE IS NOT A U.S. CITIZEN. 8 U.S.C. § 1481 (setting forth the ways a citizen may renounce citizenship). AN AFFIDAVIT PURPORTING TO RENOUNCE CITIZENSHIP IS NOT EFFECTIVE UNDER 8 U.S.C. § 1481, because, among other things, “A THRESHOLD REQUIREMENT UNDER THESE PROCEDURES IS THAT THE CITIZEN BE OUTSIDE THE BORDERS OF THE UNITED STATES in order for his renunciation to take effect.” Duncan v. U.S. Dep’t of State, No. 7:08-CV-00564, 2008 WL 4821323, at *1-2 (W.D. Va. Oct. 30, 2008).”
Further, the law applies exactly the same to citizens as non-citizens, state citizens or non-state citizens, U.S. citizens or non-U.S. citizens, legal aliens and illegal aliens. Status changes nothing whatsoever. Travel.State.gov puts it this way, “Persons who wish to renounce U.S. citizenship should be aware of the fact that renunciation of U.S. citizenship MAY HAVE NO EFFECT ON THEIR U.S. TAX OR MILITARY SERVICE OBLIGATIONS (contact the Internal Revenue Service or U.S. Selective Service for more information). In addition, THE ACT OF RENOUNCING U.S. CITIZENSHIP DOES NOT ALLOW PERSONS TO AVOID POSSIBLE PROSECUTION FOR CRIMES WHICH THEY MAY HAVE COMMITTED OR MAY COMMIT IN THE FUTURE WHICH VIOLATE U.S. LAW, or escape the repayment of financial obligations, including child support payments, previously incurred in the United States or incurred as United States citizens abroad.”. https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/legal/travel-legal-considerations/us-citizenship/Renunciation-US-Nationality-Abroad.html. So, there is no advantage in attempting to renounce U.S. citizenship whatsoever.

The Government of The United States of America maintains in the face of the aforementioned argument  that U.S. citizenship have never legally existed. 

In the following evidence doc from 1790 the status simply reads “citizen of the United States”: 

Example:

 

In the 14th amendment it reads: 

Amendment XIV

Section 1.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Constitution of the United States: 

Section. 2.

The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year by the People of the several States, and the Electors in each State shall have the Qualifications requisite for Electors of the most numerous Branch of the State Legislature.

No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the Age of twenty five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen.


THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT U.S. CITIZENSHIP EXISTS

So where did the title U.S. citizen status come from and why is it so important to call it U.S. citizenship?

Who knows because there is no such body politic as U.S. congress, U.S. senate, nor U.S. house of representatives nor any constitution in existence that established the aforementioned body politic. This means there is no Federal law in existence that pertains to anyone at the moment unless the matter is settled. 

Why are inhabitants trying to renounce something that does not exist by any constitution in existence in the entire world? 

Where is our U.S. citizen card to prove our status? 

Where do we take an oath or affirmation to obtain the status of U.S. citizen? 

We have asked around and some people claim that U.S. citizen and citizen of the United States are interchangeable however that would be considered hearsay. Every Attorney in existence knows that terms and styles are extremely important when it comes to intent and sueing the responsible party. Go and ask around, the clerks of the counties claim there is no such oath or affirmation in existence to take as a U.S. citizen. 

A birth certificate cannot be used as an identification document to obtain a state id card so the birth certificate is not evidence of U.S. citizenship. The 14th amendment is not evidence of U.S. citizenship. 

Voter registration means that a person registered with a 527 organization, private company, so voter registration is not evidence of U.S. citizenship.  

Status is nothing to take lightly and the Government of The United States of America has already challenged the U.S. on the legitimacy of its existence as a country and has remained silent on the matter and is currently in default.  LINK

Third Party beneficiary: LINK

Lawyers can’t claim a direct benefit nor obligation if the third party was never involved with the original contract. The legal definition only reads the third party may have rights. 

What Is a Third-Party Beneficiary?

A third-party beneficiary is a person or business that benefits from the terms of a contract made between two other parties. In law, a third-party beneficiary may have certain rights that can be enforced if the contract is not fulfilled.

Someone is playing a very cruel trick on the inhabitants and has kidnapped about 330 million persons and no one seems to notice.  

Hereby published by the committee of the National assembly for the Government of The United States of America, 

09-04-2020

This is not your American Government nor country!: Message to Pope Francis through Pope Francis private attorney!

 

PUBLISHED IN THE Continental Free Press ON 09-03-2020

INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE

Source: LINK

From:

Inhabitants are being told that the following is your American Government: 

Here’s Your American Government ——
(1) The Union, dba The United States
(2) The Federation, dba The United States of America
(3) The Confederation, dba States of America
Your Government has Power-Sharing Agreements and service contracts called “Constitutions” with these following subcontractors, which function as the Federal Government:
The “US” Federal Government ——-
(4) The Federal Republic (American, absent since 1860)
(5) “the” United States of America (British, Territorial Government)
(6) “the” United States (Papist, Municipal Government)
They pair up under their Power-Sharing Agreements like this:
(X) The United States (Union) partners with “the” United States (Municipal)
(XX) The United States of America (Federation) partners with “the” United States of America (Territorial)
(XXX) States of America (Confederation) partners with The Federal Republic. (This whole part of it is gone and needs to be reconstructed.)
But in the meantime, we can function just perfectly well, as we did from 1776 to 1781, with all international and global powers being vested in The United States of America (Federation).
All we need is for you and all the others to figure it out and come join us. Declare your birthright political status, record it, and join your State Assembly.
This is your country, and it’s still yours  etc…..
The Vatican private attorney that is writing this garbage is attempting to re-survey all of these entities wherein the Vatican private attorney that wrote it is not a party to any of it.
We say country and then the Vatican private attorney says country. We say States of the Union and the Vatican private attorney says States of the Union. 
Reality is this: the Vatican private attorney really has no clue how the country is formed and surveyed. All the Vatican private attorney is doing is trying to push the people that do know the answers so the Vatican private attorney’s master can extract more information to try to find a hole for the eventual attack. 
Answers in blue and lies in red:
(1) The Union, dba The United States: No, there are two separate Unions, one is spelled Union 1774 to present and the second Union is spelled like this: union in all lower case letters presently under a federation. 
(2) The Federation, dba The United States of America: False: the federation does business as the United States of America.  The United States of America is a confederation which is a Federal Republic reformed on August 5th, 2015. Two separate timelines. 
(3) The Confederation, dba States of America: Completely false. 
Your Government has Power-Sharing Agreements and service contracts called “Constitutions” with these following subcontractors, which function as the Federal Government: False, completely made up to confuse. 
The “US” Federal Government —–(15)United States” means—a Federal corporation; LINK
(4) The Federal Republic (American, absent since 1860)- The Federal Republic was stuck in committee under the Articles of Confederation of 1781 until 2010. 
(5) “the” United States of America (British, Territorial Government) False: Agent for the United States.
(6) “the” United States (Papist, Municipal Government) False
They pair up under their Power-Sharing Agreements like this: False
(X) The United States (Union) partners with “the” United States (Municipal) False-See above
(XX) The United States of America (Federation) partners with “the” United States of America (Territorial) False- The United States of America is the National Government and stands alone as a sovereign country.  
(XXX) States of America (Confederation) partners with The Federal Republic. (This whole part of it is gone and needs to be reconstructed.)  False: The Federal Republic has already been rebuilt and reconstructed. There never was any entity called States of America under any form of a confederation. 
But in the meantime, we can function just perfectly well, as we did from 1776 to 1781, with all international and global powers being vested in The United States of America (Federation). Completely false: The United States of America functioned for 13 years and is currently repopulating the States of the Union. Something that the Vatican private attorney is trying to stop. 
Source: LINK  page 9: 
The Interdependence Assemblies, their concluding consultation, and Convocation will provide the initial 1976 program agenda for the Bicentennial era paralleling the thirteen years matching the period between 1776 and final adoption of the U.S. Constitution in 1789.
Notice the dates that are used above: 1776 to 1781- The Vatican private attorney is trying to avoid a liability for trespass on a valid country on behalf of the Vatican private attorney principle, Pope Francis.
The New World Order attacks keep coming and the real country keeps kocking those attacks out of the park. Yahushua/Jesus continutes to protect this country; The United States of America over and over. 

Hereby published by the committee of the National assembly for the Government of The United States of America, 

09-03-2020

The American National Union Amends Article 3 of the Bi-Lateral Social Compact Agreement of the People for The United States of America

Published by the American Herald on 09-01-2020

INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE

Tonight the American National Union of The United States of America motioned to amend Article 3 of the Bi-Lateral Social Compact Agreement for the people of The United States of America.

Article 3 reads as amended:

The people agree that all people have a natural and unalienable right to worship in accordance to their own conscience and according to the dictates of their own conscience; and that no preference shall ever be given by law to any religious establishment, or mode of worship in any republic form of Government within the States of the Union of The United States of America. Therefore the States of the Union within The United States of America religion is hereby known as the followers of the Way the Truth and the Life; and LINK

This motion establishes the religion for the States of the Union within The United States of America! LINK

Published by the committee for the American National Union of The United States of America. 

 

 

The General Post Office of the Government of The United States of America extends immunity to Kenosha, Wisconsin police officers!

 

PUBLISHED IN THE Continental Free Press ON 09-01-2020

INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE

The General Post Office of the Government of The United States of America extends immunity to Kenosha, Wisconsin police officers as it pertains to the Jacob Blake case!

• Rusten Sheskey; and
• Vincent Arenas; and
• Brittany Meronek; together and separately hereby  have full immunity from any prosecution as it pertains to the Jacob Blake case: 

1: A warrant was issued. 

2: A verified complaint was in existence. 

3: An injured party was present. 

4: Jacob Blake was obligated to cooperate. 


In other News: The three enlisted and Non-Commissioned Officers in the Continental Army was Granted the rank of CAPTAIN within The United States of America Continental Army:
• George Bendt Sornson; and
• Jeffrey Alan Thomasson; and
• Marlo Maurice Jones;


Source: LINK

Hereby published by the committee of the National assembly for the Government of The United States of America, 

09-01-2020

Anna Von Reitz is teaching a demonic doctrine and does have a blood oath to the Pope!!

 

 

PUBLISHED IN THE Continental Free Press ON 09-01-2020

INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE

Quotes in red, responses in blue: 

Quote: Source: LINK

Blood Oaths

If you ever accepted the Apostle’s Creed and took Communion, you have a blood oath, but chances are, you are too ignorant to know that.

But I just told you, so now, you have no excuse.

You just never thought about it that way, but upon any reflection at all, that is the only way to interpret what you’ve done.

The Apostle’s Creed was never a blood oath. That teaching is demonic in nature because it is a lie. LINK

This is what Anna Von Reitz really said in her own writing: 

“Yes, I have a blood oath standing on the altar of the Universal Catholic Church.
Please note that the Universal Catholic Church is not the Roman Catholic Church, but
the far, far greater Church at large.”  Then she goes on to explain that the blood oath has nothing to do with the Roman Catholic Church as if there were two separate churches. Anna Von Reitz is trying to explain that her blood oath to the Pope is some kind of truth bond that has to be done before witnessing against the Pope and his minions.  LINK

Here is Anna Von Reitz’s problem, the Apostle’s Creed is not a blood oath, and the Universal Catholic Church is headed by Pope Francis. LINK

“The Catholic Church, originally (and still sometimes) known as “The Universal Church”, is the largest denomination of Christianity with over 1 billion members worldwide.” 

and

“The Catholic Church is headed by the Pope, currently Pope Francis, who is of Argentinian descent, is also the leader of Vatican City, a sovereign nation-state.”

In fact, the Universal Catholic Church is not separate from the Roman Catholic Church as Anna Von Reitz would have people believe, they are one in the same. If you have a blood oath to a foreign Monarch, your ass belongs to that foreign monarch because the Apostle’s Creed is not a blood oath. However, as we further see, Anna Von Reitz is once again attempting to pull all people under her master Pope Francis. This is called trafficking in persons. 

Then Anna Von Reitz goes onto to say: 

What else do you do, when you accept the wine in token of his blood?  False teaching, wine taken in remembrance of his blood sacrifice is not drinking the blood of Christ nor is it a token. That lie is taught by satanic churches. 

By word and deed you have bound yourself to the Apostle’s Creed. This comes from an imagination that is trying to pull everyone under her Master as a setup statement as you will see later in this publication.   

“I believe in one god, the Father Almighty, maker of Heaven and Earth, and in Jesus Christ, His only Son, our Lord, who was born of the Virgin Mary, suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified dead and buried…..” This is not a part of a blood oath. 

And you drank the wine and ate the bread and never thought a single thing beyond that, never recognized the Apostle’s Creed as a Blood Oath bound with Communion wine and your own blood, his blood in your blood.

How stupid can we all be, if this is not apparent?

How many “good Christians” out there have been thoughtlessly slurping up Communion every Sunday of their lives, and never realized what they were doing?”

What Anna Von Reitz is trying to explain that doing something in remembrance of an event is somehow a blood oath. This type of false teaching takes a pure act of remembrance and turns it into something that is twisted and evil. 

Definition of blood oath
an oath taken by two or more people in whom they ceremonially use or exchange each other’s blood. 

Lord, help us, so that we may not perish for our ignorance…. Prayer to the devil….

Many of the same people out there poking each other in the ribs and whispering, “Hey, be careful with that Anna von Reitz character, she’s got a blood oath with the Pope!” have no idea that they have a blood oath themselves—- and not just with the Pope—with every Believer, of every denomination worldwide, who accepts the Apostle’s Creed and takes Communion Once again, from the mind of a twisted woman trying to hide that she is not an American and has a blood oath to the Pope. 

That’s called the Universal Church, for all of you who were never taught much of anything in your lives, and were never curious enough to ask any questions, either.  Everyone can see now that this statement is a lie because of the facts as written above in this publication. 

That’s right, all you Methodists are yoked with all you Presbyterians, and the Church of England is cheek and jowl with the Lutherans, the Wesleyans, the Nazarenes, and the Full Immersion Community Baptist Temple. And like it or not, you are yoked to every faithful Catholic and member of the Eastern Orthodoxy, too.  Boom, gotcha Anna Von Reitz, the second time attempting to promote the world church for your master with a twisted and false doctrine and calling others stupid if they do not fall for your scam. The scam of hiding exactly who you are and who you work for.. 

That’s what it means to be “one body” in Christ. His blood with your blood, your blood with his blood, and with the blood of all those who are sanctified, alive and dead and yet to come. No Anna Von Reitz, your blood is not holy and you cannot redeem any church as you claim. You Anna Von Reitz are spewing a false doctrine for your New World Order buddies and a lot of self worship. 

Lord, forgive us for being stupid. We remember your words. We don’t know what we are doing….. help us to wake up and become fully conscious…. Anna Von Reitz, this is not anywhere in the bible and you do not pray in Public as the hypocrites do, you are supposed to pray in a closet. 

Blood oaths are common as dirt, and you all have plenty of them. Once again, Anna Von Reitz, attempting to claim power of attorney, she drags people into your brand of hell with your false doctrine and twisting of the Holy Scriptures. The truth is that you are where you are all by yourself and good luck with that. 

What do you think marriage is, if not a blood oath? What do you think all your kids are, but living blood oaths? Your blood bound to your spouse’s blood in living 3-D? Oh, Anna Von Reitz, you did not sell your New World Order here and have a completely different explaination in your other document thereby calling a blood oath a bond to witness against the Pope and his minions. Most liars forget what they lied about.  

Lord, give me the patience to endure to the end, all the thoughtless ignorance of this world..The only ignorance that exists is that inhabitants like Anna Von Reitz try to lie their way through life so others will send them money. It is absolutely ridiculous to think and preach that any blood exchange happens with Jesus.  

Gospel of Matthew from the Holy Scriptures says what a false teacher does.  Jesus himself said in Matthew 24:11 that they lead many astray.

Hereby published by the committee of the National assembly for the Government of The United States of America, 

09-01-2020

NOT  BLOOD OATH

“The Apostles’ Creed
I believe in God the Father Almighty,
Maker of heaven and earth:
And in Jesus Christ His only Son, our Lord;
Who was conceived by the Holy Spirit,
Born of the Virgin Mary,
Suffered under Pontius Pilate,
Was crucified, dead, and buried;
He descended into Hades;
The third day, He rose again from the dead;
He ascended into heaven, and sitteth
On the right hand of God, the Father Almighty;
From thence He shall come to judge
The quick and the dead.
I believe in the Holy Spirit,
The holy Christian church,
The communion of the saints,
The forgiveness of sins,
The resurrection of the body,
And the life everlasting.
Amen.”


INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE

THE FOLLOWING pdf’S ARE NOT AUTHORIZED WRITINGS OF the country: The United States of America and should be ignored as false information: 

1: noticetobillbarr

2: dearmrtrump8312020

Hereby published by the committee of the National assembly for the Government of The United States of America, 

09-01-2020